When first opening each website in their own different windows, I noticed that the “This is Reality” site seemed much more interesting than “America’s Power.”
Though I initially had no interest in clean coal, I began scanning through the more interactive “This is Reality” website where they keep giving facts about the faults in clean coal. Knowing that coal is a fossil fuel that gives off many gases that are harmful to the environment, I could only see myself agreeing with the facts being presented in front of me. The site gave many reasons why coal burning is harmful, and even revealed that even after all of the advertising of clean coal, there’s not one power plant that stores its global warming pollution. They talk about how we need to invest more in solar, geothermal, and wind sources because they are not only efficient, but are renewable sources that do not emit the CO2 that burning coal does. These facts appeal to logos right away after the comment about there not being any plants that use the CC as claimed.
Flipping over to “America’s Power,” I was presented with reasons why coal is good for us. They try right away to appeal to the every day person and how they use electricity for video games, tv, and charging cell phones, so that we can’t say we aren’t indirectly using the coal ourselves. Tons of numbers are thrown around to make it seem as though things were being done to make our lives better with the use of coal. It is easy to even see a more localized view of how much coal energy is used by state so that we can more easily relate the how much coal we really use. There’s a fun little game where you can provide power to your house using different means of energy sources and the run different kinds of common household items. This serves to appeal to the logic of how using coal would give us more energy than any other source.
Both sites appeal to the average person in that they are trying to get us to use logic to reason with them. Many environmental councils and federations sponsor “This is Reality,” which to me seems as though they may be leaving things out, because to me these people always seem a little radical in their views, and not too much was said that I couldn’t have already guessed. “America’s Power” was set up in more of a legit looking website that appealed to me more and seemed more credible rather than a website that I could’ve put together. Overall, I would have to say that “America’s Power” seemed more like it was explaining to me facts with things to back up their claims as “This is Reality” just seemed like a website that Joe Dirt made because he doesn’t like power plants to burn coal.
While I do agree that "This is Reality" is leaving out a lot of facts on our needs for coal and is run by environmentalists, I do believe they are more legit then the "Americas Power" website. The anti-CC website has facts and quotes from credible knowledgeable sources, debunking the myths of Clean Coal. While the "Americas Power" website is more organized and legitimate, there are no sourced facts, they are all opinions from the coal companies who are protecting their interests. The coal companies do say they can collect CO2 in the future, but without any enforcement, they have no reason to, as it will cost them more money, thus lowering profit.
ReplyDeleteI found it hard to find the complete facts site on the "This is Reality" site, and when I did, it seemed that the fly-by facts were very condensed and biased. However, I do like that the "This is Reality" site had citations for where they got their information, and I could not find such a page on the "America's Power" site. My reasoning for that would be that they would be citing themselves because they're sponsered by the coal companies that have/make the facts. This makes the "America's Power" site less reliable to me.
ReplyDeleteI feel the same way you do about learning about the harmful affects of burning coal. I was never really interested before I saw these websites. The Reality website really won over my attention because it gave so many facts and interesting information about how harmful coal really is. The other website however did not appeal to me in the same way it did you. I did look at Ohio to see that most of our electricity comes from coal, but that did not discourage me from looking at other sources. I think this is a really great way for them to pull people back into the research for clean coal, even though there are probably better ways to give us power.
ReplyDelete